From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Roland Winkler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:13:22 -0500 Message-ID: <87sk0hpbj1.fsf@niu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286522477 26174 80.91.229.12 (8 Oct 2010 07:21:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 07:21:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 08 09:21:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P47GV-0006me-Mq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:21:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50637 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P47GU-0000KL-Jw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 03:21:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43236 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P44L4-0004mq-4S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:13:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P44L3-0004kj-Aj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:13:46 -0400 Original-Received: from tfkpsv.physik.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.164.197]:5279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P44L3-0004kR-5V; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:13:45 -0400 Original-Received: from regnitz (msdvpn233.msd.anl.gov [130.202.251.233]) by tfkpsv.physik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1800728C30; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 06:13:34 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: 87hbgx8nob.fsf@catnip.gol.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 03:21:02 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131472 Archived-At: > I think that rebinding arrow keys (and other "basic" keys) is > often done badly, in that any new bindings should somehow have a > similar "feel" to the default bindings, even if the action is not > strictly the same. In general, I like to use ibuffer, but some of its key bindings for handling marks (quite orthogonal to dired's keybindings) regularly drive me nuts. I'd much appreciate if ibuffer's keybindings were more consistent with dired. Roland