From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs and the Status Notification Specification Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:46:33 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87sjqq93ie.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87wrgcz9ks.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8762nrcl8k.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vcvqp3zv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k4c3xzmm.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309484835 28237 80.91.229.12 (1 Jul 2011 01:47:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 01:47:15 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 01 03:47:11 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcSp4-0003EC-Fv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 03:47:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49306 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcSp3-0000CJ-9n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:47:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56197) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcSoh-0000BS-Ju for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:46:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcSof-0006xD-G0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:46:46 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:40494) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcSof-0006wv-2i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:46:45 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcSod-00036W-AV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 03:46:43 +0200 Original-Received: from c-67-186-102-106.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([67.186.102.106]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 03:46:43 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-67-186-102-106.hsd1.il.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 03:46:43 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-67-186-102-106.hsd1.il.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:L5rQmVC3QcmBSPLFjr9wlX8DFxE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141305 Archived-At: On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:18:28 -0400 Richard Stallman wrote: RS> Regarding REL, it's not a bad name, but sounds a bit like RHEL, the RS> RedHat Enterprise Linux distribution. So it could be confusing. RS> RHEL is not mentioned terribly often in our discussions, and it is a RS> GNU/Linux distro, which is a very different kind of thing from a RS> library of Lisp packages. I think the context will usually avoid RS> confusion. RS> Thus, this is a small flaw -- much smaller than the problem we are RS> trying to solve. If our choice is GELPA or REL, we should definitely RS> use REL. RS> Or we could add "GNU" and make it GREL. Is that better than REL? RS> REXL, suggested recently, is not bad. Or GREXL? GEXL? RS> Any of them would avoid this predictable confusion. My vote is for GELD: GNU Emacs Lisp Depot. Seriously. But any of the others are good too. Ted