From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Evgeny M. Zubok" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Policy for documentation of ELPA Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:25:03 +0400 Message-ID: <87sjq9lvps.fsf@tochka.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310592414 15135 80.91.229.12 (13 Jul 2011 21:26:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:26:54 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 13 23:26:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh6xF-0000Zp-ST for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:26:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44701 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh6xF-0001SS-1Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:26:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh6wn-0001Oz-0b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:26:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh6wl-0001vw-JW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:26:20 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:44504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh6wl-0001vk-5g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:26:19 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh6wk-0000Kd-10 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:26:18 +0200 Original-Received: from 91.79.148.185 ([91.79.148.185]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:26:18 +0200 Original-Received: from evgeny.zubok by 91.79.148.185 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:26:18 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.79.148.185 User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5wNRNdQMn40iawCzfO/obL5IPC0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142011 Archived-At: Hi, I have written documentation (an initial version) for one of the ELPA package. The source is the texinfo file. I see that auctex provides the documentation as exported .info file along with Postscript and PDF in ./doc directory. Muse also provides the .info file. No package that provides source of documentation (texinfo files, PostScript diagrams and figures, etc). What is the current (if any) policy for documentation? Should the package also contain sources, just in case if someone want to improve the documentation?