From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Does CEDET work? Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 05:39:35 +0800 Message-ID: <87sjg07m94.fsf@gmail.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334797833 12425 80.91.229.3 (19 Apr 2012 01:10:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 01:10:33 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 19 03:10:33 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SKftI-0001JR-MN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 03:10:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52489 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKftH-0003wO-UO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:10:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKftB-0003vz-Th for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:10:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKft7-0006nE-Lt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:10:25 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:37345) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKft7-0006n5-Ef for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:10:21 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SKft5-00018h-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 03:10:19 +0200 Original-Received: from 119.255.41.67 ([119.255.41.67]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 03:10:19 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by 119.255.41.67 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 03:10:19 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 119.255.41.67 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:WJpS8hGqmu7F2iPGQy8r7SlUK9U= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149794 Archived-At: On 2012-04-19 06:05 +0800, joakim@verona.se wrote: > This type of humour is sometimes funny in #emacs, but does not translate > at all well to emacs-develop where people are trying to be productive. Indeed. But the question is genuine. I have been comparing two python editing environments: PyCharm (commercial) and Emacs. And the former got decent parser for everything remotely related to python: js, html, xml, css, sass, sql, coffeescript etc. etc not to mention python specific stuff. I can appreciate such an intelligent environment and the enormous productivity it enables. Leo