From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET non-regression bug fixes Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:51:15 +0100 Message-ID: <87sj8ar6fg.fsf@engster.org> References: <87k3tprzss.fsf@engster.org> <876258rp28.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353009093 27662 80.91.229.3 (15 Nov 2012 19:51:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 15 20:51:44 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ5TU-0006AC-5L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:51:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53557 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ5TK-0007Cp-CZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:51:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52708) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ5TF-0007CR-Ri for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:51:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ5TC-0001uC-Pi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:51:29 -0500 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([83.169.19.17]:35728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ5TC-0001qI-E5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:51:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=B2uELjmjtSchEh4bd13QPXRrfbybsUsT7SW+L42pGx8=; b=UBys1RauL0OumuAJDm6CduRXGWvn2Pr1hUQzQKzVrel+pwBDxEmui+u4ADn3fzTSzs2Mn7r9LKI2cE4tT5jx64PQu6ngSuFYPc8w5k8Sa3bSuYkUyWEUZRyTN86hjr0F; Original-Received: from dslc-082-083-051-122.pools.arcor-ip.net ([82.83.51.122] helo=spaten) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ5T2-00069z-N5; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:51:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:16:48 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Followup-To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 83.169.19.17 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154873 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> At this stage, there must be a *Completions* buffer, otherwise it's an >> error anyway. But regarding the freeze, I will wrap something around >> that making sure it exists. > > I'd rather keep this for trunk: > - it's not safe. > - It's not a regression. > - It's not even a bug fix: it improves behavior more than it fixes a bug. OK. >>> We need to do something to avoid those problems. AFAIK there's no >>> reason to ever prefer get-file-buffer over find-buffer-visiting, so >>> maybe we should simply get rid of get-file-buffer and make it an alias >>> of find-buffer-visiting. >> Oh, you have my vote for that. > > Great! How much (time and effort) are you willing to contribute to > my campaign? Can't I just give you money? Anyway, do you plan on actually replacing all `get-file-buffer's? That would have to wait for the release anyway, I guess. -David