From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rename `eww' to `web' Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 08:20:31 +0530 Message-ID: <87siztyb2g.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8738s087wj.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo6mjv4s.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871u7gavwx.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87obaj39sc.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4btxkb7gw7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87k3l72z81.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87obaixhkr.fsf@informatimago.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372992542 1271 80.91.229.3 (5 Jul 2013 02:49:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 02:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Mathias Dahl Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 05 04:49:02 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uuw4x-0005Iw-44 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 04:48:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45509 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uuw4w-0006OQ-Kp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 22:48:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uuw4s-0006O9-HM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 22:48:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uuw4r-0005QC-LZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 22:48:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::234]:41984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uuw4r-0005Pu-FX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 22:48:53 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id xa12so1688247pbc.11 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 19:48:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=j12SGOoCjhUHL5bEk8g0fdrA2Z6KSGxn+W4BHAHm+hk=; b=waGEkhg7fVDVX/TRNHn8ceaLTCSsgMKU4IKhmzoSsO9A3fkyQQD885H72FFPp0QvJU OlRnxKY+ZuH1JxMz70d+x1gufrHJnOwL729SfuuAE4fIz500py9EBwKsLHCSwFBAZ5iG 20wrpetNCBZF7s9Op+cd+z4e+1PkaBz0iNID2npxx6zEOYKEXlA11UnobPmu22JXPTW/ VHLdP/joXe+jB10rw+OQvLByHlPbibczE6NX/jQ92u6c92qsrwcGCvVo1Xh5ePOIc0iA TBlOVcvJrqeSJfcJ+UM8C8pHmCt3xaL+hMdiRkh9AebYj28zH4r75YcIZvxyi1VFFFR2 kYuw== X-Received: by 10.68.212.229 with SMTP id nn5mr7828414pbc.44.1372992532620; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 19:48:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from debian-6.05 ([115.242.150.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id at1sm5044790pbc.10.2013.07.04.19.48.49 for (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jul 2013 19:48:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Mathias Dahl's message of "Thu, 4 Jul 2013 23:08:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c01::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161555 Archived-At: > I felt... something (a small disturbance in the force, maybe)... when > the name change came up. > And, I see now, the name "tumme" is still there in the form of an > alias for one of the commands in the package. Retaining "tumme" as a command is a good and smart gesture on the part of whoever took that decision. I am happy that aliasing route has gained lots of traction and that some traces of "eww" will remain. Who knows the non-sensical sounding "eww" could have some meaning in Norsk (or whatever) > So, that was my little insignificant story... What if tumme had been erased altogether? Would you be here to tell the story? ps: Question in last para is rhetorical, btw.