From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:53:27 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87sihfchl4.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87a93oh180.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83h9xw9zg3.fsf@gnu.org> <83d28k9yb9.fsf@gnu.org> <83ppcj9740.fsf@gnu.org> <871toze1tl.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wq6rcidx.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416412526 32403 80.91.229.3 (19 Nov 2014 15:55:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:55:26 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 19 16:55:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr7bD-0003Nj-LV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:55:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59192 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr7bD-0000OT-A8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:55:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56640) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr7ZE-0005VH-SW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:53:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr7Z9-00052t-0N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:53:16 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51871) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr7Z8-00052k-Qq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:53:10 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr7Z7-0002Sc-77 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:53:09 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:53:09 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:53:09 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:gI1hz+8Vm6POaZ165NtbXnNtB8w= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177765 Archived-At: On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:47:43 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> You could create the *eww* buffer immediately? LMI> We could, but it would look kinda odd. Or perhaps not? Pop up the LMI> empty buffer saying "Loading..." It's possible. It's an opportunity for a spinning 3-D EWW logo, so I wouldn't turn it down. >> At medium or lower `nsm-security-level', I wouldn't expect to be queried >> in the case you describe. But at high or above, I would. LMI> If the certificate is invalid when we're visiting www.google.com, I LMI> think the default (i.e., `medium') setting should be to query the user. Right, sorry. By "queried" I meant "queried even if you're in a different buffer." Ted