From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 20:13:59 -0600 Message-ID: <87si7977rs.fsf@tromey.com> References: <833865vp4d.fsf@gnu.org> <54E2355A.90@87.69.4.28> <83vbj1u020.fsf@gnu.org> <54E24CA4.9020601@dancol.org> <83h9uk7ddb.fsf@gnu.org> <54E382A5.5030408@dancol.org> <54F789B2.6030105@dancol.org> <87egnel6ac.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vbgpk1po.fsf@lifelogs.com> <85mw20gmeo.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <878u97nyjn.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86d1yirnqw.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1440427813 15827 80.91.229.3 (24 Aug 2015 14:50:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Aur=C3=A9lien?= Aptel , Daniel Colascione , Stephen Leake , Emacs development discussions To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 24 16:49:59 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTt4Q-0001nP-Av for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:49:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48844 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTt4P-0002xI-PH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:49:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43847) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZThHP-0002kV-5R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:14:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZThHK-0003zG-69 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:14:35 -0400 Original-Received: from gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.38.55]:54395) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZThHI-0003yH-LQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:14:30 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 9360 invoked by uid 0); 24 Aug 2015 02:14:20 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy5.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 24 Aug 2015 02:14:20 -0000 Original-Received: from box522.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.122]) by cmgw2 with id 8SE21r00T2f2jeq01SE5FY; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 20:14:18 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=C6F6l2/+ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=GsOEXm/OWkKvwdLVJsfwcA==:117 a=GsOEXm/OWkKvwdLVJsfwcA==:17 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=zstS-IiYAAAA:8 a=a4K5GIyuExAA:10 a=PnD2wP_eR3oA:10 a=TpTlBxB_VV4A:10 a=uRRa74qj2VoA:10 a=CkLCXQA45mwkoo5zdAsA:9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=d7wLUAbJkEI2gvNN82dZs4r2We0oMgDtp0n/eckriNA=; b=YNIRDJH1KIc8M4N6sJXucHH7gBF3/Q1q05Agk3RTtUi5JLLdCtVFfy17g1FUNKZj7j0U9ywbuDTHvZtjyn/GCemg2VLWnRRPVeXLa/yfGaaX78L2/Vc+jQEJGSzBeXqZ; Original-Received: from [71.215.96.11] (port=34607 helo=bapiya) by box522.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZThGt-00081S-Tu; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 20:14:04 -0600 X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:26:51 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Identified-User: {36111:box522.bluehost.com:elynrobi:tromey.com} {sentby:smtp auth 71.215.96.11 authed with tom+tromey.com} X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 67.222.38.55 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:189099 Archived-At: Stefan> IOW we don't need to worry about local Lisp_Object values: they'll be Stefan> found by the conservative stack scanner. Is there a reason to keep GCPRO around? Tom