From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joakim Jalap Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Overlays as an AA-tree Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 08:16:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87shqihdje.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <87d1jylv43.fsf@fastmail.com> <87a8f0p69w.fsf@fastmail.com> <878tujlmp0.fsf@fastmail.com> <87k2dx97tq.fsf@fastmail.com> <834m51csqz.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuol8gxv.fsf@fastmail.com> <1047fa66-2cd2-3073-5916-49357c12eeef@gmail.com> <87y40cszpk.fsf@fastmail.com> <7f6fdfd1-93ab-5faa-efc4-3faccfda00ab@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479885656 30676 195.159.176.226 (23 Nov 2016 07:20:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 07:20:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (berkeley-unix) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 23 08:20:53 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c9RrM-0006vX-QK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 08:20:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60017 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9RrQ-0006W9-9d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 02:20:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Rqn-0006W4-Lj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 02:20:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Rqk-0006hH-JH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 02:20:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=52441 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Rqk-0006gl-Cx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 02:20:10 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Rqd-00085f-IQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 08:20:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:aRB0O9LLqjREDYLFiEjYRdeXF8g= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209557 Archived-At: Evgeny Roubinchtein writes: > This is really exciting work. > > I realize this is a politically-charged issue, but would it be > possible to reuse some of the design (if not the code) from XEmacs > extents? It is not politically charged for me :) I have never used XEmacs, but I will have a look at the 'extents' feature. However, what I'm trying to do is just to change the underlying implementation, not change how overlays behave. But I will have a look at extents, thanks for the tip! -- Joakim