From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andreas Politz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Image formats support Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:27:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87shma1wze.fsf@luca> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489847267 15227 195.159.176.226 (18 Mar 2017 14:27:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 14:27:47 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs developers To: Fabrice Popineau Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 18 15:27:42 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFKV-00030f-7D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:27:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53545 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFKb-0002d3-0G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:27:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52851) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFKV-0002cx-88 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:27:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFKR-0007n3-Bk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from gateway-a.fh-trier.de ([143.93.54.181]:60030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFKR-0007mb-0C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:27:35 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-new + McAfee uvscan + ClamAV [Rechenzentrum Hochschule Trier (RZ/HT)] Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [95.91.222.207]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: politza) by gateway-a.fh-trier.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3179C179B3AA; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:27:18 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=hochschule-trier.de; s=default; t=1489847238; bh=uHmUxDaxchwqCBOCaOiaajdNyNM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UBLVgeR4LkHj8PKmPQAuipi+TC19xPHyLDg9+TCJ8xMhpXrCwHyAQyHLX6jVm8Jtw Chuy6EDrxnNoSn7dEd4Wlq1GjB9zxmKERb9c4E7eJpzxMgn+0rGf3usB4cT5lx/cpu 7jwKTDIguNZYNmYWVCOue0vw6g5z/v4ZzFMGTBj0= In-Reply-To: (Fabrice Popineau's message of "Sat, 18 Mar 2017 14:38:01 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 143.93.54.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213120 Archived-At: Fabrice Popineau writes: > Maybe a stupid question but if emacs is compiled with ImageMagick support, > what is the point in asking JPEG, PNG, etc support at the same time from independent libraries ? > Shouldn't configure made those options to be exclusive ? Imagemagick is handled like an image type, so png and imagemagick are two different types. One uses libpng as backend and the other libmagick. > Also what is (are) the drawback(s) of ImageMagick support vs the other libraries ? In my experience, libpng is faster then imagemagick. -ap