From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native line numbers landed on master Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:29:22 +0200 Organization: not if I can help it Message-ID: <87shi3j8kt.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83k23jl5ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8yjcem0.fsf@gmail.com> <8337a3j8te.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499787044 18102 195.159.176.226 (11 Jul 2017 15:30:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:30:44 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 11 17:30:39 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUx7S-00049B-Uy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:30:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47033 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUx7Y-0007W0-6P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:30:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUx6e-0007Uq-MI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:29:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUx6d-00045N-EK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:29:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=45415 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUx6d-00044r-7U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:29:43 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUx6R-000151-Oi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:29:31 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:QpU9pZu4qj4Vz2EdJ1ZS2KPMELE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216484 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:00:55 +0200 >> >> If I customize line-number-current-line to have a background colour, >> then when the current line is wrapped, the current line number and the >> empty space(s) below it have that backround applied. I was hoping to >> have that apply just to the line number itself. > > Are you talking about display-line-numbers set to t, and then about > the empty field displayed for continuation lines, which show no > numbers? Otherwise I don't understand what you mean by "empty > space(s) below it". Yes, I mean the empty field. > If you indeed mean continuation lines, I'd like to hear from others > what they think about this use case. Displaying the empty fields in a > face different from the number itself is some work, but I will do it > if that's the "popular demand". I can live with it, it just looks a little jarring when there are continuation lines. Regards Robert