From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'? Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:19:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87shdncwdq.fsf@web.de> References: <87infp9z6j.fsf@web.de> <87zi90eehg.fsf@web.de> <87o9ocd6s4.fsf@web.de> <83zi7wr6jc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510240844 13589 195.159.176.226 (9 Nov 2017 15:20:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 15:20:44 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 09 16:20:36 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCod6-00034w-Uc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:20:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37470 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCodE-0002Ck-9z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 10:20:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCocY-0002CQ-MQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 10:19:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCocU-0005Ij-Rz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 10:19:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:61451) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCocU-0005HJ-IU; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 10:19:54 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.217.120.125]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lr2dj-1erMED3xJb-00eeZl; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:19:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83zi7wr6jc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 08 Nov 2017 20:04:23 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:A5R4XQ8MpseFzlxjR46Hyq8RRkd6THpCbki0E9pQHuX9JulwSdb dT621/+8cto5WcsdCi11GWKJVJwCScfdR+2NYWGnVAhGOGq9jP3Hk7GKdk1V5M6YkadNP1T TKtTfrDW67yI/O3awUNnMv5bTOvDtUT8M2svqsLUT1s5tC3shfSUd4xUe4QLl38ORMQ8hWl 8zJpBrBjjpjCDVkOsC9lw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:swZdOLtB1tw=:5nxKU1xa877bbLqQCab2yX zhmHEzjpWtcl13vRd1EyQB2lrW9Wyzqpsntte1d4TbOTKTJwkC/Ev6B21VpYxbY2+gb2em+Gp URQzKqG+ZpnzBh11dPKpuKDroqd/EyHFhNtCyLUEAoY2Iy8+EQ+Jj89Clw7mDgFqvb/muhG4o wY5QKPvWHcH2BUEiL/nMBoDrRBqNTyMFRj878Mr15Stmc3AWeN1h48FVlIuqlqBr1ZlucQlud vGdoEnCe0YR1MqgCbuimZfOciWTmREiy2x7+w4Xv0LiAQzewGwEcllQRyAixCTcKlVQltzZl5 APriJvj76D+w3xXdqAKimr9WbrZkGNPEGpkPecW9TJRSOwdMSXWG7SPY3B6l+tHZqK1kBksJH +5l82nQ/nRYw606GUrBYZmi41mrlU5GCO5CyauayHT8BmYWoZNvc77C4vL5rzxZC4mftmTKO/ uYZNLMlbs+pEDp/IJOCDrwiJUyiBsaAY9Q9ksTp4jWAmnMoO8gMABjLZRqP8mp2xpgxMgNwiY f+vB+lRo9g4R+qNCH3VEWWZyv5q20KhFTH0nX+D3ggMkPqfoU5mj4sYNXeGIZhURQDAXK0pfh pq+2bcs0rbxOMy++9OXcr8OMQz4sera3X122NGxsfu+geTAoM1yrsvbfDPlLJGnHbH2fvWjxw URo2PrF7vGi3/ndTqU7nyHTT+IDQqPZWm6YTMTHwOMZ0JQGT0BLvHYkO7BwA4EnrkQYOLL0xJ 8cf4/QZOY/BmeXHrMLsNOAmsBRoEsrDsWvFekiBNmqFssoCvQPpTXaMwrVBtbeyKEKr/pwgp X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.11 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219993 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > +(defmacro lazy-let (bindings &rest body) > > + "Like `let' but make delayed bindings. > > And this seems to use a different term for this. > > > +This is like `let' but any binding expression is not evaluated > > +before the variable is used for the first time. > > The "like let" part is a repetition of what was already said in the > first sentence, so there's no need to repeat it. Done. The updated cumulative patch is in the answer <87wp2zcwm2.fsf@web.de> to Stefan's response. Thanks for reviewing, Eli. Regards, Michael.