From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tramp inconsistent completion over default directory Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 13:16:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87sh6ifwq9.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87sh6jn1f9.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <874lizd65m.fsf@gmx.de> <87o9h7hdkv.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <87a7srhd30.fsf@gmx.de> <87r2m3d51y.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1527074077 12857 195.159.176.226 (23 May 2018 11:14:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 11:14:37 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuri D'Elia Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 23 13:14:32 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLRiy-0003FV-Jt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:14:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60660 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLRl5-00050I-OO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 07:16:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50079) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLRky-00050D-U6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 07:16:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLRkw-0006eF-9p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 07:16:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:57725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLRkw-0006e2-0a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 07:16:34 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.60.250]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lqhaw-1fzkab2y70-00eKv4; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:16:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r2m3d51y.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> (Yuri D'Elia's message of "Tue, 22 May 2018 18:32:41 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:R/pFQjlzhrYi4scTQ5069bTF6Q0Me1NLPjBjsGvScXgpR+gPdkL aSQiu0yHqEBsAE1XcMVhtPIqGsSOEg2w2Hoosq/fkn8Ya2a2V8ECDiHinVZQVXh3AHJa/mD JZIIwhOOVxfEFUeDOzGmnVzCVhzo+QeZEPrzsLrK0cXyen1NR+VP5XMv/q9t/858v+EBnAb 8uErOTuuCUI+LYoz9dh+A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:T910zUY5WyA=:9ndR/o2i2t7YYdHEIP6MGA RRqfD7LO0ONGcnDD5VnOZY2jKDu8hmrKz/dWP9Fr/mtSrcoEn9xRC6XP0cB2UcD12i76lIO/M LfXAa2Wj1ZIkZ8ggTOkfg4RgsUkz17ipkLUcD5X2eEaVs2kUWq+gUiUJUAmPx2E9JvhCHR4B0 tJps5ZdmLm1w30T4tT3eaSKC2WMNHJ8MorG/tH6axt5Qjbv6d9bFIimVr6xFlp0/ioqG4flsH lDztK+Ym021s89e0VHQy1ZuWLnLaHIAIXY915NpZTA9m0KCR4nbnACRN4xg5eeZh+eFiZJE3o 3chF1IlajRoKM7rTrpN765FVXh3Lgmp6C7vqs8bLTdrmyO3Qr4SjawphB1kWTQoIXt4o+OXAt lknIl09+qHJ4EPiyBiDpCr0JgJqKH2R6ygggbrHiw2OyTyiBIHRIiPtHxLSyGp+GCQfa8R0/E JVGSS1/bFZLMMYSifbZS8llVwtQBhzXxYqnp4Mdj0w2tGPJZEObiTUDa3dzXMfvdY51Ai0R5T V6tjPRGB3Qi7YVpvUn/m31vIq5OeuLBNuUMHQbstIXdUq4uRSs4oPa/QmGQzyl2gg7sSFCzan B1pjeLicCoiIjFRf8h7sj6cI3Vmnrt62J68Y7QPDycrnmDfuUtDuBmeyYtLoDM8ZkfgXYbNUy AhkNdbSjd0hLTlI7dPhsXp/8EAcg9wFnXubbOh+/TK0gytWe1njPu9fHuYuoOJnzlHGGTO/MR rt6r9z/9KBNYBSqQ21Wmvx3iqdVll0X0Pe6VXq8sH/6KP5six1zIc1m01Q3iQPNfNsaCsKT7 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225596 Archived-At: Yuri D'Elia writes: > When using multi-hops, perhaps? Although the syntax doesn't seem > ambiguous to me by another cursory look. > > Maybe with the old syntax it was possible though. Likely, it was related to the ambigous old syntax, when you didn't know whether "foo" is a method or a hostname, after typing "/foo:". So it was unclear, whether "baz" would be a remote file name to be completed, after typing "/foo:baz". An additional slash "/foo:./baz" made it obvious. I'll check whether I could improve this, now with the changed syntax. Best regards, Michael.