"Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie> writes:

> Oleh Krehel <oleh@oremacs.com> writes:
>
>> Should we figure out where to put the "main" `xor' and declare the rest as
>> obsolete aliases?
>
> Yes please!  I've had a patch to this effect sitting on a local branch
> for a while now.  Will touch it up and send soon.

Now attached.

It defines xor using defsubst instead of define-inline, so that it can
be included in subr.el.  Would defun be preferred instead?

It also includes Mattias' equiv suggestion.

WDYT?

Thanks,

-- 
Basil