From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 262d0c6: Mark some tests as expensive Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:30:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87sgblk82t.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20200910182904.20559.25935@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200910182905.F0E4520A2E@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <877dt0is0p.fsf@gmx.de> <83a6xve0vq.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6xv456t.fsf@gnus.org> <837dszdyqv.fsf@gnu.org> <877dsz2o03.fsf@gnus.org> <83363ndvql.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh5tzwog.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14956"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, Eli Zaretskii , mardani29@yahoo.es, stefan@marxist.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 13 17:32:01 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHTyy-0003l0-OT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:32:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55932 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHTyx-0001iV-P7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:31:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49290) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHTxn-0000j0-0M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:30:47 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:36198) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHTxk-0005sg-3a; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:30:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vYzk3izxgVtFjLn+iN5+8u4FQIo3eI3x0FMk2mpZI48=; b=u61FRWzSOVZM30/OZx9n/yOVfo BpzKcDvIT4zmVXDyH83mDJIsrGorYgzdSGXroAxau97h8M3fx4xKwHkE4w8vCdwvlsEVUX7Cpefhj 9nbfdDXa0EttPomQMUETUEdySG6H1G+XdIlDy9I/7Aiw80kem4w4xC/E6Q8POAXiO3pU=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHTxc-0004YU-3E; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:30:38 +0200 X-Now-Playing: Men's _Making Art Remix EP_: "Making Art (XXXchange Remix)" In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:21:42 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255511 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > FWIW, I think The Right Solution is to label each test with its "cost" > (which could be auto-computed by a script that runs those tests to > measure that cost). Then we can provide a command to run all tests > cheaper than X, and the end-user gets to decide where is "the cutoff" in > his balance. Sounds great. Would we put the "cost" into the tests themselves, or have a separate (auto-generated) file for this? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no