From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: xterm [menu] key definition Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:16:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87sfywvcxp.fsf@igel.home> References: <20210819024728.kgnf6jmpakqdto4p.ref@Ergus> <20210819024728.kgnf6jmpakqdto4p@Ergus> <87mtp71i4s.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <20210824081906.lg2qt4z2snhaxnjv@Ergus> <20210824083433.GC17209@tuxteam.de> <20210824091741.heeyge3xhufujkd7@Ergus> <20210824110014.GA28734@tuxteam.de> <20210824153003.d5oakoawkqwke2yb@Ergus> <20210825070640.GB11313@tuxteam.de> <20210825093212.jliurmm3j2x7yvyk@Ergus> <20210825104717.GA22741@tuxteam.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40380"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: Ergus , tomas@tuxteam.de, EMACS development team To: chad Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 26 10:17:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mJAZX-000AGr-EL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:17:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47780 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJAZV-0005eg-BJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 04:17:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42692) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJAYU-0004t2-Pv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 04:16:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:48190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJAYS-0007Bb-C3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 04:16:10 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GwFzR5H8Sz1qxjf; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:16:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GwFzR4sJ3z1r6P6; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:16:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SmucbfGHiAhC; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:16:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: KK0/cx+nt5bLhjKdpMOmbeX70gDT1knZ0Ci4kWdv9Ir5QV59YJ2+AW0nBc4CKaIT Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-172-67.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.172.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:16:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0B2802C25AD; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:16:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: Oh, I get it!! ``The BEACH goes on,'' huh, SONNY?? In-Reply-To: (chad's message of "Wed, 25 Aug 2021 22:47:23 -0700") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.18.0.9; envelope-from=whitebox@nefkom.net; helo=mail-out.m-online.net X-Spam_score_int: -3 X-Spam_score: -0.4 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.4 / 5.0 requ) HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273014 Archived-At: On Aug 25 2021, chad wrote: >> By then, we'll have a new key, >> this time it'll be Google's vanity key, say "search" [4]. > > > You should definitely set up that bet, but you shouldn't get many takers -- > Google's Chromebooks replace the Caps Lock key with a dedicated "search" > key more than a decade ago. Keyboards with a search key are even older than that. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."