From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matt Armstrong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: noverlay branch Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 09:51:32 -0700 Message-ID: <87sfjzefvv.fsf@rfc20.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12714"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 07 18:53:22 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ogqbC-00035m-B3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 18:53:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42268 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogqbB-0004T1-5Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 12:53:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogqZb-0001tS-5r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 12:51:46 -0400 Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:45815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogqZX-000427-KB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 12:51:41 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: matt@rfc20.org) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 980B9E0002; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 16:51:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rfc20.org; s=gm1; t=1665161496; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kHIpOXrVAOEu2bkVKLiF3Ktx2Eru4h4K7oQjb7iR1EE=; b=KMSot5itItizIQry4hBNv+D6jo5ga2cN5JoK0Qgkwg9WTmJU56M1KwLT2tJy18QhZnB9yP DHEZacYEF+bYqb7Y2V1IM1TzeN7vAEdcoVAK2eU3C4qZyMF18Q34wtxLKmtnxJB1XNKKMW 1NDk551ODU0BwuJTFtfH89rVdAtYZdPmphhbvyWsvaSMYenkio4r/FavrJhha1GEh4Zk9F F8DTmkVADyl5Xw8smGPCAaruSm1eijlKxkkFUGCOYiefyo7zDMTVSorlXPYXLHrbZbi2Ap s6PVdeq8PZg3Ypyp4QP+P3CzAmgEKQ9DReDCHH7tE1enGvZjUlkC3dFj8gMnQQ== Original-Received: from matt by naz with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ogqZQ-004KKZ-1z; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 09:51:32 -0700 In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.196; envelope-from=matt@rfc20.org; helo=relay4-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297162 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I just updated the noverlay branch to the code in `master` (most of it > was mechanical except for the fact that since the last commit on that > branch we have gotten rid of Lisp_Misc and we moved to pdumper). > > I'm getting ready to install this in `master`, so I'd encourage people > to try this code as much as possible to try and weed out the most > glaring problems before it hits master. Stefan (and others), where are we at with this? Are there things that must happen before a merge? Is anybody able to use the noverlay branch for daily work? I'm running the noverlay branch now and was observing an eassume failure. I recompiled without optimization and with Address Sanitizer and ran Emacs under GDB, but haven't seen the crash since... No crashes so far, despite doing substantially the same things. I am hoping it is not an opt only bug. If I isolate anything concrete I'll file a bug.