Re: [ELPA] New Package: p4_16-mode

[Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>]

Soham Gumaste <sohamg2@gmail.com> writes:

>> +;;; History:
>> +
>> +;; The headers above have no special meaning, and could also be
>> +;; re-written in prose under a special section.  Also, was the package
>> +;; really created just a few days ago?
>> +
>
> I mean, moved the file into a repo of its own on that day, and began making some
> modifications to better suit ELPA. The original file has a date from 2017.
> Should I use that instead?

I think that would reflect the history better.

>>
>> I suppose you want to add the package to NonGNU ELPA then?
>>
>
> I was not familiar with the distinction between GNU ELPA and NonGNU
> ELPA. But now
> that I have read up a bit, NonGNU ELPA does fit better.

OK.

> I have applied your patch, thanks for taking the time to help me with it.
> Please let me know if any further changes are needed, or if I need to
> create a new thread to submit to NonGNU ELPA.

As mentioned in the last thread, I don't know if "p4_16" is a technical
term, but I know that it is an unusual symbol name, so I want to make
sure if it would be possible to call it p4-16 or something like that
instead.

> Thanks

-- 
Philip Kaludercic