From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: dangling markers Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 12:17:09 +0000 Message-ID: <87sewuk4l6.fsf@localhost> References: <87v81u85hv.fsf@localhost> <87frsx81m2.fsf@localhost> <87cyo180y2.fsf@localhost> <874j9d7zqe.fsf@localhost> <87sewvg6lw.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21774"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , eller.helmut@gmail.com To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 30 14:15:59 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sNtTK-0005QE-I1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 14:15:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sNtT9-00056h-BD; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 08:15:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sNtT5-00056K-Ju for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 08:15:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sNtSx-0001Fa-M6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 08:15:38 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86A7B240027 for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 14:15:32 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1719749732; bh=tYT+2PZt/f/IJ8oPUGKkLhJIju63R6AYANnQ8VM9VFE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=IGBckvIRBcAHeZanJnD8UU54E2LLe3EsjhSyN9dYx4aKCI9Jpn0Qx4ltBUB10QjYB J1yyT76rpUHWthu7Sy+IOPLCE7/3JE3vonnt0BQYkVn6UdKm+MklxqcusWhPd+F3Ra tghYqVLFoKLcI7c0Eqe8cBXGW+fJKXCBZ15vyeOBKr6mibgxpPBBEOs42gxrN41xUO YuNDJrlLqVV5YsL9QjxApa8wuXiyUvg8MQqtu4YZMxYTA85cv/PSMkHBrobn6CM7fj 6vvRAiiZfnBvCeSQeQ5l/GDhThxdX+wp6kQwmECmYtOWX5EyOFm2Hcte3T07tQTBnR ltFlcfPsCxKLg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4WBp6C57Vnz6twn; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 14:15:31 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320955 Archived-At: Gerd M=C3=B6llmann writes: > Gerd M=C3=B6llmann writes: > >> I think I have an idea: What if igc_add_marker records in Lisp_Marker at >> which index in the weak vector it stored the marker? That would make >> igc_remove_marker O(1). > > Pushed that to scratch/igc. > > Ihor, could please measure again? As expected, igc_remove_marker disappeared. igc_add_marker is still there. 33.12% emacs emacs = [.] igc_add_marker 7.31% emacs emacs = [.] exec_byte_code 5.24% emacs emacs = [.] re_search_2 4.39% emacs emacs = [.] Fmemq 3.85% emacs emacs = [.] re_match_2_internal 3.07% emacs emacs = [.] funcall_subr 2.74% emacs emacs = [.] buf_bytepos_to_charpos 2.65% emacs emacs = [.] buf_charpos_to_bytepos 2.38% emacs emacs = [.] Ffuncall 1.68% emacs emacs = [.] funcall_general 1.08% emacs emacs = [.] plist_get 1.04% emacs emacs = [.] alloc_impl --=20 Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at