From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: fun-names.el --- avoid function duplication Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:55:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87sevvf6jn.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <8734nvgv5o.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9936"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:k9YS6u3bQaxfdloqiwAQh+Gt8gY= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 27 13:59:22 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sXg52-0002QR-0y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 13:59:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sXg4H-0005x8-Li; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 07:58:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sXf5N-0008JS-8y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 06:55:37 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sXf5L-00058y-L3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 06:55:37 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sXf5H-0004s3-Uf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:55:31 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 07:58:32 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:322121 Archived-At: > https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-init/fun-names.el Check out version 1.2.4, same place. It can now output a neat table, so if one searches for gnus-group-mark-buffer, you get in *fun-names* 1. gnus-group-mark-group 0.88 2. gnus-group-mark-regexp 0.75 3. gnus-group-mark-region 0.75 4. gnus-group-setup-buffer 0.75 5. gnus-uu-mark-buffer 0.75 6. gnus-group-remove-mark 0.75 7. gnus-group-mark-update 0.75 8. gnus-group-set-mark 0.75 9. gnus-update-group-mark-positions 0.67 10. gnus-summary-walk-group-buffer 0.67 -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal