From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric S Fraga Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default Info face Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 12:18:27 +0000 Organization: On the Interweb somewhere Message-ID: <87seqlrxpo.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <87wmfxgvjd.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27131"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: gnus (Emacs 31.0.50) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:IfCEnMTdkYCmbN+opY27PJP1H18= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 18 14:12:18 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tNtqc-0006rs-1B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 14:12:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNtpw-0006rU-LM; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 08:11:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNt0n-0001Wz-Db for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 07:18:45 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNt0k-0003jg-6D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 07:18:44 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tNt0e-0001Hk-GX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:18:36 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Url: https://fediscience.org/@ericsfraga/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 08:11:25 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326645 Archived-At: Response below/inline for email tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > (original email sent 18 Dec 2024 at 11:22) > > I think it's a bad idea to encode a font property into a base font's > name. +1 But the OP's suggestion of a different face for Info mode may be a good idea, with the default being to simply inherit from default? -- Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 31.0.50 2024-12-17) on Debian 12.6