From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Assignment of misc packages for emacs Date: 17 May 2002 20:15:59 +0900 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87r8kbyqhc.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> References: <200205050534.g455YfF01634@aztec.santafe.edu> <5xbsbumexh.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200205141941.g4EJfud15293@aztec.santafe.edu> <5xvg9qmgzt.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200205151927.g4FJRRW26103@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5x3cwr4q7m.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200205162249.g4GMnLH03933@rum.cs.yale.edu> <2110-Fri17May2002092748+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <8296-Fri17May2002124003+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021634288 30065 127.0.0.1 (17 May 2002 11:18:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 11:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 178fkO-0007oo-00 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 13:18:08 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 178fwq-0007ef-00 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 13:31:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 178fkc-0000fk-00; Fri, 17 May 2002 07:18:22 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp02.fields.gol.com ([203.216.5.132]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 178fiM-0000YA-00; Fri, 17 May 2002 07:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from tc-2-246.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.25.246] helo=tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp) by smtp02.fields.gol.com with esmtp (Magnetic Fields) id 178fiK-0000eY-00; Fri, 17 May 2002 20:16:00 +0900 Original-Received: by tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9EF7430AC; Fri, 17 May 2002 20:15:59 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <8296-Fri17May2002124003+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Original-Lines: 19 X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4052 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4052 "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > I don't like comint because it's so huge, and because it won't even > load on systems without async subprocesses. > > I don't think shell-style completion of commands should depend on > comint, anyway. I agree on both counts; I was really just pointing out my personal quick hack. Perhaps pcomplete would be appropriate -- would the problems encountered before when trying to use it with comint affect minibuf usage (I can't rightly remember what they were)? -Miles -- [|nurgle|] ddt- demonic? so quake will have an evil kinda setting? one that will make every christian in the world foamm at the mouth? [iddt] nurg, that's the goal