From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RMAIL slows Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 10:13:06 -0400 Message-ID: <87r7gln4r1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <85ll7m8nbq.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1115304421 18710 80.91.229.2 (5 May 2005 14:47:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 14:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 05 16:46:58 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DThbf-0003aF-7u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 May 2005 16:45:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DThjC-0000sQ-7P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 May 2005 10:53:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DThYs-0001Lb-AJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2005 10:42:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DThYr-0001LM-LR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2005 10:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DThR1-0006Sf-VE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2005 10:34:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.184] (helo=tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DThBF-0006k3-5V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2005 10:18:21 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([67.71.119.169]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050505141306.THMJ21470.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Thu, 5 May 2005 10:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97634D72F6; Thu, 5 May 2005 10:13:06 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: bob@rattlesnake.com In-Reply-To: (Robert J. Chassell's message of "Wed, 4 May 2005 07:31:01 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36706 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36706 > so it looks to me that a long list of markers accumulates over time. Sounds credible. Can you go to the RMAIL buffer and try something like (length (save-restriction (widen) (overlays-in (point-min) (point-max)))) to see how many overlays are in the buffer? Overlays are often the main cause of accumulation of markers. Stefan