From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: public@heslin.eclipse.co.uk Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unreliability in process output Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 11:18:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87r7fd5eyt.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118226991 26925 80.91.229.2 (8 Jun 2005 10:36:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 08 12:36:30 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dfxu7-0003rU-1u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:35:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dfy0n-0004fK-QR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 06:42:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DfxxG-00048T-Vt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 06:38:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dfxv6-0003tc-Nk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 06:36:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dfxv4-0003Vd-OA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 06:36:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1DfxjL-0004Cg-Ur for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 06:24:16 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DfxbJ-0001fr-Pw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:15:57 +0200 Original-Received: from 213-152-32-235.dsl.eclipse.net.uk ([213.152.32.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:15:57 +0200 Original-Received: from public by 213-152-32-235.dsl.eclipse.net.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:15:57 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213-152-32-235.dsl.eclipse.net.uk User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:jOeRwz6I11BSt2JIcWxp7o0Hx/E= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38310 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38310 Andreas Schwab writes: > Do you happen to run Linux 2.6.10? That might be the same issue that > Stefan observed recently (see topic "File botched up using Tramp" > ). Just to add another data point: I have observed file corruption when using tramp to edit files on a remote machine which happens to be running a 2.6.10 kernel, even when the local machine on which Emacs is running has an unaffected kernel version. Peter