From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Completion in GUD buffer Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 23:53:32 -0500 Message-ID: <87r74ojxr1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <17447.7497.809146.303654@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <873bh4lgme.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <17447.27596.415016.280125@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143435239 22040 80.91.229.2 (27 Mar 2006 04:53:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 04:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 27 06:53:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNjjl-0001ef-WD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 06:53:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNjjl-0000ML-KM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 23:53:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FNjjT-0000Ln-Vt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 23:53:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FNjjS-0000LA-BH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 23:53:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNjjS-0000L7-7y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 23:53:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.4] (helo=tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FNjks-0001LS-6q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 23:55:02 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor ([70.55.143.15]) by tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060327045332.PBJG27612.tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 23:53:32 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E860D734A; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 23:53:32 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Nick Roberts In-Reply-To: <17447.27596.415016.280125@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:36:28 +1200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52079 Archived-At: >> > but there are 91 difference between this file and the previous one. >> >> > Before I wade through them, I'd like to ask if people agree that this >> > change in behaviour should be reverted? >> >> I'm not sure which change of behavior you're talking about. AFAIK there's >> just a bug, especially the "Wrong type argument: window-live-p, #". > That part is a bug. What I mean is do we want the user to able to select the > completions window like before, or do we only want to allow him to select an > item in the window with mouse-2? I don't see from the ChangeLog how the mentioned patch would have such a consequence on the behavior of completion, so I suspect that once we've fixed the bug, the question will disappear. Stefan