From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: allout patch - more safe-local-variables, plus autoloads Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:39:25 -0400 Message-ID: <87r73uji3b.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <2cd46e7f0604171211s5ef0e820gebc4e68b2ce2606d@mail.gmail.com> <8764l7m40w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145421593 25269 80.91.229.2 (19 Apr 2006 04:39:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 04:39:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ken.manheimer@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 19 06:39:46 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FW4Th-0003Eu-S6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:39:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FW4Th-00082w-D3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:39:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FW4TW-00082h-5y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:39:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FW4TU-00082H-Cd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:39:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FW4TU-00082E-5g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:39:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.54] (helo=tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FW4UT-0000PK-94; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:40:33 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([70.53.192.213]) by tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060419043928.SGMW20622.tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:39:28 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 631F5D845C; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:39:25 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:17:13 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53056 Archived-At: > I think it is legitimate to use t for boolean variables. All values > are safe for them. > If we don't use t, what would we use for them? If we disallow t and want a quick&dirty replacement predicate for boolean values, we can either introduce booleanp (seems like a good predicate to have around anyway) or just use symbolp. Stefan