From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: recenter-top-bottom Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:35:18 +0000 Message-ID: <87r6iuclpl.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194960953 26558 80.91.229.12 (13 Nov 2007 13:35:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:35:53 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 13 14:35:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Irvvb-0005SA-5V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:35:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IrvvO-0007ac-PQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 08:35:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IrvvK-0007Wr-Kq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 08:35:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IrvvH-0007SE-Rh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 08:35:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IrvvH-0007Ry-Lh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 08:35:23 -0500 Original-Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.185]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IrvvH-000122-71 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 08:35:23 -0500 Original-Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 19so1997105fkr for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 05:35:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=MqQw7W6oYDmF1vHpq2pmEP7SBtNUn5ZXUU/1EBjnAxg=; b=P7RghVeJll8c90X93k+qoOrXlu5/CX1txeJKTbJ5aYcAxoq7XhxwZUSGE/1k0KeWS1DEX3v9R5NzveZNzJVUHOtx7ZWDqOfr9WzIEmf8eB2F4q28cqMYmkGdP2MjRIdQ3KGjMwRq9n0ObGa0R09iFRkZiQ/2Nwaml5TawWbHfs8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=Z9XqtA9wcNbTUx4wQD07OebdsvVm6sR/UlWik50UTmzu9dUNolDjadwLPS76oBy6nJAw68UWzz8QXN2u9NJ33d4p9dD3+lVotNWzZP+gJPQRp5b+UzvDF3kNZj3IDI/GUiOd8ftTMZ/STnF9qoiRKDutyyCjJbGaJ2EJk2/htAg= Original-Received: by 10.82.119.17 with SMTP id r17mr1608387buc.1194960921914; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 05:35:21 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [82.45.210.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z37sm5534951ikz.2007.11.13.05.35.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 05:35:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 96D701575BA; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:35:18 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:00:55 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83121 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: >> The status quo that satisfies everyone is to use `C-0 C-l' (just two >> keystrokes) to put point to the top, and `C-- C-l' (again two keystrokes) >> to the bottom. > > I'll still use my `C-l', because it's easier for me (same key, even if > repeated), but your point is valid. > > As I said from the beginning, the proposed behavior is only a minor > convenience. And it is (now) obviously not seen as a convenience by > everyone. Let me state again that I *do* like recenter-top-bottom-1. I am just sceptical about recenter-top-bottom-2. -- Bastien