From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sven Joachim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: kill-buffer-if-not-modified: Wrong type argument: bufferp, t Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:55:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87r6gawdrt.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87fxwrc92i.fsf@gmx.de> <87ve5mc3if.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200984853 3334 80.91.229.12 (22 Jan 2008 06:54:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 22 07:54:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JHD1j-0002Xq-Nw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:54:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHD1K-0000no-7f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:54:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JHD1F-0000j4-EW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:54:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JHD1D-0000e7-M6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:54:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHD1D-0000di-Dw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:53:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JHD1D-0007zJ-Bi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:53:59 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2008 06:53:56 -0000 Original-Received: from p54866E36.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO debian) [84.134.110.54] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 22 Jan 2008 07:53:56 +0100 X-Authenticated: #28250155 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+wtDxpswmw5GAp8FJZdRbL/igro9yx+Q/A97NPEQ yuC42fqjUqtexO In-Reply-To: <87ve5mc3if.fsf@gmx.de> (Sven Joachim's message of "Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:44:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87277 Archived-At: On 2008-01-21 21:44 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > But maybe this is not so important. There is another inconsistency, > though: pressing C-x C-q in the modified buffer does not enter view mode > again. Please disregard this comment. Having slept over it, I now realize that C-x C-q should _not_ enter view mode, since Emacs was already told to exit view mode before.