From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Are we in feature-freeze? Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:13:20 -0400 Message-ID: <87r674rgy7.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <18654.49490.721063.934103@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87vdwh2cr8.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1222578772 16499 80.91.229.12 (28 Sep 2008 05:12:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 05:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 28 07:13:50 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KjobO-0006OT-4S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 07:13:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42428 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KjoaK-0007S6-SS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:12:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KjoaE-0007RK-V2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:12:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KjoaD-0007QV-7H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:12:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39463 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KjoaC-0007QB-UX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:12:36 -0400 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.115.2.24]:55031) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KjoaB-00083I-GT; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:12:35 -0400 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D9D2057E32F; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:13:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 28 Sep 2008 06:25:01 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104206 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Is FOR-RELEASE supposed to be the definitive list of things to be > fixed before the release, or are there some alternative methods > available now that we use a bug tracker? The items in FOR-RELEASE are not indicative of anything right now, so please ignore them. I am relying on the bug tracker, specifically the bug count as an indicator of how close we are to the pretest. When we get closer to the pretest, we'll probably begin tagging some bugs as high severity in the bug tracker, to indicate that they have to be solved for the release. But for now, everyone should just try to fix whatever they can see in the bug tracker.