unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Óscar Fuentes" <ofv@wanadoo.es>
To: rms@gnu.org
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Basic Bazaar guide for Emacs hackers.
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:38:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r5ri9c8c.fsf@telefonica.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1NEYPD-00019C-DF@fencepost.gnu.org> (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:16:51 -0500")

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

>     http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/emacs/BzrQuickStartForEmacsDevs
>
> It is nice and simple.  I have one critique.  Someone said that the
> term "checkout" for bound branches is deprecated.  It might be a good
> idea to use the preferred term instead, and perhaps use a different,
> not-to-be-deprecated command as well.

I thought about this at the beginning and decided to do that way because
the document either uses undefined concepts known by CVS users or
defines the concepts that are new to them, as it does for the shared
repository.

Replacing

bzr checkout URL

with

bzr branch URL
bzr bind

will force me to explain what a Bazaar branch is and why it can be bound
or unbound, and thus would introduce us into the field of multiple
workflows, which is precisely what the document tries to avoid.

I don't see the `checkout' command deprecated or with its current
semantics changed anytime soon. This is a big change that would merit a
dot-zero version, and AFAIK that's not expected for a long time.

The terms are correct as per the "intended future" meaning, as we are
indeed creating a "bound branch" (which is absolutely orthodox). Using
the expression "heavyweight checkout" (or simply "checkout") is right
too, as any Bazaar user will recognize its meaning for a long time, and
even the term is profusely used on the documentation of the upcoming 2.1
version.

-- 
Óscar




  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-29  4:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-27 23:19 Basic Bazaar guide for Emacs hackers Óscar Fuentes
2009-11-28  1:23 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-28  1:48   ` Óscar Fuentes
2009-11-28  2:05   ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-28  7:10     ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-28  3:10   ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-28  3:48     ` Óscar Fuentes
2009-11-28  7:29       ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-29  1:16         ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-28  7:27     ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-28 10:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-29  1:16 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-29  4:38   ` Óscar Fuentes [this message]
2009-11-29  5:27     ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-29  5:52       ` Óscar Fuentes
2009-11-29  7:00         ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-29 16:29           ` Óscar Fuentes
2009-11-30  1:36             ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-30 15:52     ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-30  2:05 ` Karl Fogel
2009-11-30  2:17   ` Lennart Borgman
2009-11-30  2:46     ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-30  3:26   ` Óscar Fuentes
2009-11-30  3:51     ` Karl Fogel
2009-11-30  5:01     ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-30  5:20       ` Óscar Fuentes
2009-11-30  6:03         ` Karl Fogel
2009-11-30  6:41           ` Óscar Fuentes
2009-11-30  7:21           ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-30 19:27           ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-30 19:37             ` Karl Fogel
2009-11-30 20:36               ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-30 21:06                 ` Karl Fogel
2009-12-01  1:53             ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-12-01  4:09           ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-30  6:41         ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-30  7:02           ` Óscar Fuentes
2009-11-30  9:17             ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-30 14:35               ` Karl Fogel
2009-11-30 15:31               ` Óscar Fuentes
2009-11-30 17:40                 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-30 18:02                   ` Óscar Fuentes
2009-12-01  1:21                     ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-30 19:21                   ` Karl Fogel
2009-12-01  4:10         ` Richard Stallman
2009-12-01  6:21           ` Óscar Fuentes
2009-12-01  6:52             ` Karl Fogel
2009-12-01  8:34               ` Jason Rumney
2009-12-01 15:26                 ` Karl Fogel
2009-12-01 19:03                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-12-01 19:56                     ` Jason Earl
2009-12-01 20:21                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-12-02  1:28                         ` Stefan Monnier
2009-12-02  7:20                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-12-02 14:42                             ` Stefan Monnier
2009-12-02 15:59                               ` Karl Fogel
2009-12-02 17:44                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-12-02 18:16                                   ` Karl Fogel
2009-12-02 18:20                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-12-03 12:22                                     ` Richard Stallman
2009-12-03 15:32                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-12-03 17:44                                       ` Karl Fogel
2009-12-02 18:40                                 ` Óscar Fuentes
2009-12-02 21:21                                   ` Martin Albisetti
2009-12-04  0:31                                   ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-12-02 18:29                               ` Óscar Fuentes
2009-12-02  2:07                         ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-12-03  1:22                           ` Richard Stallman
2009-12-03  9:08                             ` David Kastrup
2009-12-04  0:21                             ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-12-02  7:33                       ` Richard Stallman
2009-12-01 21:44                     ` Óscar Fuentes
2009-12-01 22:06                       ` Karl Fogel
2009-12-01 21:53                     ` Stefan Monnier
2009-12-02  7:32             ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-30  6:44 ` Glenn Morris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r5ri9c8c.fsf@telefonica.net \
    --to=ofv@wanadoo.es \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).