From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-w3m? Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:23:05 +0900 Message-ID: <87r5o6ya7a.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <3E1D063D-AC8A-4E40-B9F8-6ACA5089C4A7@gmail.com> <873a0p1dqt.fsf@telefonica.net> <87r5o9yr4y.fsf@telefonica.net> <87mxywzx2r.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ocjcejeo.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83r5o8l3oo.fsf@gnu.org> <873a0nyqjx.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87sk8nx7ba.fsf@telefonica.net> <83y6iedi2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87tyt2ygyq.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83sk8mdecc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267283515 19557 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2010 15:11:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 27 16:11:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlOKb-0000rP-2W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:11:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53686 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NlOKZ-0006ov-OL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:11:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NlOKU-0006ms-Bi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:11:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39809 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NlOKT-0006mS-CM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:11:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlOKS-0002FJ-Sh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:11:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:46138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlOKR-0002Ey-Cn; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:11:39 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49383820D; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:11:34 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5F807120772; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:23:05 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <83sk8mdecc.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" a03421eb562b XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121440 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Maybe. But, given that his .bzr.log only has a single "add" command > for that single file, what else could be at work here? How could anyone guess? Bob posted an incomplete log (that's clear both from the fact that part he did post starts with that add command and from his comments about using isearch and M-x occur on the whole log). Even so we can see that he was typing bzr commands more or less at random in the face of repeated warnings from bzr that his workspace was not in a consistent state -- but he didn't report any of that. My advice is to forget it unless it happens again, and we can get a better trace of what actually was done.