From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: no-spam@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MS-Windows build broken in Fmake_network_process Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:29:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87r5n49wyb.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> References: <83634jglab.fsf@gnu.org> <83sk7mf91t.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269797394 1818 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2010 17:29:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Kim F. Storm" , YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 28 19:29:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvwJ2-0000Pq-Iu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:29:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49232 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvwJ2-0001d7-1g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:29:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NvwIv-0001a2-Sm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:29:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39977 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvwIt-0001U6-HG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:29:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvwIr-00018F-Ky for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:29:39 -0400 Original-Received: from ge0.mail1.hoer.dk.ip.fullrate.dk ([90.185.1.42]:59064 helo=smtp.fullrate.dk) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvwIi-00015P-He; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:29:28 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-lx.rd.rdm.cua.dk (3008ds4-amb.0.fullrate.dk [90.184.173.162]) by smtp.fullrate.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id D0A299CDFA; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:29:16 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83sk7mf91t.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:44:30 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122799 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:51:56 +0900 >> From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu >> Cc: Helmut Eller , >> emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> Actually I was aware of the above part when I committed the change in >> question. But the code above was added in 2002, and I doubted whether >> it is still the case for the systems that are supported by Emacs >> 24.0.50. So I didn't copy the above code for Fmake_network_process. > > I don't know which systems Kim Storm (who wrote that code; CC'ed) had > in mind when he made it conditional on GNU/Linux. I don't recall either, but I do remember that the conditioned code was said to be unreliable on some systems, and the only system on which I could test is was GNU/Linux, so I conditioned the code in the hope that someone would eventually test the code on other platforms and lift the restriction (if safe). -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk