From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: yank-pop error unnecessary and annoying Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:31:09 +0900 Message-ID: <87r5k92fiq.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87vd9lziqo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <871vc91au6.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276570757 25328 80.91.229.12 (15 Jun 2010 02:59:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:59:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , Geoff Gole , Emacs development discussions To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 15 04:59:13 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OOMMr-0005kE-2M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:59:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34252 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OOMMq-00088y-Ba for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:59:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47578 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OOMMj-000882-Ed for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OOMMi-0008Mw-8R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:59:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:47780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OOMMh-0008G9-TG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDEA8213; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:33:27 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 73BA11A27D2; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:31:09 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <871vc91au6.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" a03421eb562b XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125940 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > It Would Be Nice (tm) if the "yank-pop without previous yank by deleting > last yank" behavior could be implemented, but I don't know how easy or > difficult it is. I assume the main complication is how to handle the > case where the buffer is modified since the last yank. Finding what to change might also be somewhat harder than "trivial" if point has moved.