From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Antoine Levitt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Slow/poor responsiveness in org files Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:53:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87r54j5426.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87fwkzcg7d.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1313668433 1725 80.91.229.12 (18 Aug 2011 11:53:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:53:53 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 18 13:53:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qu1AQ-0001wc-I0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:53:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42670 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qu1AQ-0000L3-6h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:53:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qu1AN-0000KM-7K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:53:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qu1AL-0004rv-PG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:59419) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qu1AL-0004rf-KD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:53:41 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qu1AJ-0001th-Fu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:53:39 +0200 Original-Received: from uni14-1-82-233-220-106.fbx.proxad.net ([82.233.220.106]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:53:39 +0200 Original-Received: from antoine.levitt by uni14-1-82-233-220-106.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:53:39 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 42 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: uni14-1-82-233-220-106.fbx.proxad.net Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143405 Archived-At: 18/08/11 09:49, Bastien > Hi Tim, > > Tim Cross writes: > >> About a week or so ago, I updated emacs from bzr and saw that org 7.7 >> had been merged in. Since then, I have also noticed a distinct delay >> when performing various editing operations within org files. For >> example, killing a line wiht C-k in an org mode buffer is taking about >> 4 seconds! > > This might come either from Org and/or from Emacs. > >> I updated emacs and tried again with emacs -Q and got the same result >> >> My version is 24.0.50 bzr relno 105475 >> >> Has anyone else seen this? > > Yes. > >> What would be the best way to debug this sort of issue, emacs >> profiler? > > Four tests would be useful: > > - Emacs 23 + Org 7.4 > - Emacs 23 + Org 7.7 > - Emacs 24 (from trunk) + Org 7.4 > - Emacs 24 (from trunk) + Org 7.7 > > For each case, M-x elp-instrument-package RET org-mode RET to > see if there is any particular function that takes significantly > more time. > > I'm busy fixing small bugs in Org 7.7 but fixing such slowniness > is high priority and such tests would really help me *a lot*. > > Thanks in advance! Also try setting bidi-display-reordering to nil and see if that changes anything.