From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: completion-list-mode-map Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:26:54 -0400 Message-ID: <87r54epl2p.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <4DEA3F21.2020302@gmail.com> <4E13BC5A.2070007@gmail.com> <4E191159.1080501@gmail.com> <4E375A1C.6020108@gmail.com> <87ty9jganp.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87r54md7yt.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E4ABCA1.1060703@gmx.at> <4E4AD90C.4060007@gmx.at> <87hb5h6mg4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E4B848D.1040007@gmx.at> <87fwkzrcvz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E4CB7E0.6060901@gmx.at> <87r54iz6b5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E4E0D33.6060908@gmx.at> <87zkj3hout.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E50C59F.3040408@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1313958428 11659 80.91.229.12 (21 Aug 2011 20:27:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 20:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Christoph Scholtes , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 21 22:27:04 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QvEbo-0004kF-1R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 22:27:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37094 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvEbn-0005kh-Es for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:27:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49288) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvEbk-0005kP-GX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:27:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvEbj-0000mt-7G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:27:00 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]:57109) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvEbj-0000lI-5T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:26:59 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp-128-36-14-148.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7LKQt8F007780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:26:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4E50C59F.3040408@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:45:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.145 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143483 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> Can you provide an example of a situation in which caller of quit-window >> would not want the quit-restore-window behavior? > > With emacs -Q do C-x 2. Doing > > M-x quit-window > > now shows *Messages* in the window while > > M-x quit-restore-window > > deletes the window. This is going round in circles. We know that quit-window and quit-restore-window have different behaviors. The statement we are considering is whether all the users of quit-window would prefer the behavior of quit-restore-window, in which case we should replace quit-window with quit-restore-window. If no one provides a good example, I'll go ahead and make the change.