From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:09:58 -0400 Message-ID: <87r53ki7i1.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <4E6C80BF.2060002@gmx.at> <4E6DCB0A.4060605@gmx.at> <87mxeaar26.fsf@wanadoo.es> <4E6DFF55.3000708@gmx.at> <87ehzlnaxj.fsf@wanadoo.es> <4E6E1D4C.7030601@gmx.at> <87littrcyy.fsf@wanadoo.es> <831uvlyckf.fsf@gnu.org> <83zki9wx4u.fsf@gnu.org> <4E6E4EC7.8070901@gmx.at> <87obypvacd.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E6F45D3.3010105@gmx.at> <871uvkcuvr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E6FA09C.7000600@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315941015 1164 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2011 19:10:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 13 21:10:11 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R3YN1-00006m-5S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:10:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46750 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3YN0-0005uv-HP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:10:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3YMx-0005sJ-MI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:10:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3YMw-0001VX-W4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:10:07 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]:41762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3YMu-0001SQ-JC; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp-128-36-14-41.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8DJ9x2m015800 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:09:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4E6FA09C.7000600@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:27:40 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.145 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143989 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> I've fixed this directly in window-deletable-p. > > Thanks. Apparently > > (not (eq (next-frame nil 0) (selected-frame)))) > > which is in `bury-buffer' should do the same. Do you see any > differences? Yes, that is better. Committed, thanks.