From: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: bzr:// vz nosmart+bzr://
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:17:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r52l9mml.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1RDBS2-0000Ii-SP@fencepost.gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2011 04:43:10 -0400")
On 2011-10-10 10:43 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Maybe you know, maybe you don't, but the bzr server on savannah was
> upgraded to the latest version 2.4 a few days ago. As result of this
> (or maybe as result of some other changes on savannah), the initial
> "bzr branch" command became approximately twice faster than it was
> before. It takes about 18 min on a gnu.org machine (probably on the
> same LAN), and 1 hour on a very remote machine.
>
> What's also important, it seems to be no longer true that using the
> nosmart+bzr:// protocol for the initial "bzr branch" is faster than
> the normal "smart" bzr://. In fact, nosmart+bzr:// seems to be about
> 30% _slower_ now.
That seems to be correct.
> Would people please time the following 2 commands and see if this
> observation is correct in general? If it is, I'd like to update the
> instructions on the wiki, because describing 2 different protocols
> there might unnecessarily confuse new users.
>
> bzr branch nosmart+bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/
> bzr branch bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/
% time bzr branch nosmart+bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/
Branched 106042 revision(s).
bzr branch nosmart+bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/ 448,75s user 7,46s system 37% cpu 20:21,80 total
% mv trunk trunk.old
% time bzr branch bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/
Branched 106042 revision(s).
bzr branch bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/ 352,41s user 5,63s system 47% cpu 12:36,04 total
Cheers,
Sven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-10 8:43 bzr:// vz nosmart+bzr:// Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-10 9:04 ` Frank Schmitt
2011-10-10 9:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-10 9:36 ` Ari Roponen
2011-10-10 9:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-10 10:17 ` Sven Joachim [this message]
2011-10-10 11:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-10 10:53 ` Tassilo Horn
2011-10-10 11:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-10 14:10 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-10-10 16:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r52l9mml.fsf@turtle.gmx.de \
--to=svenjoac@gmx.de \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).