From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vitalie Spinu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs build number in version Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:48:08 +0200 Organization: EUR Message-ID: <87r4tnebvr.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87vcjkibzl.fsf@zelenka.enovance.com> <87aa0vuokd.fsf@gmail.com> <8762bf1etu.fsf@zelenka.enovance.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339321705 21484 80.91.229.3 (10 Jun 2012 09:48:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 10 11:48:24 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sdeku-0007Xn-4V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:48:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55873 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sdekt-0002dE-Nr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:48:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sdekq-0002al-1C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:48:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sdeko-0001PG-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:48:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:49261) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sdekn-0001Ov-Ok for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:48:13 -0400 Original-Received: by wefh52 with SMTP id h52so1999062wef.0 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:48:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=NtfKj8yu0etnGPc+CBtZjZ7+uF12fb33OHkjXNe50+s=; b=icgE/ADPGnzLsI+R60cEOsa6P5buLA6+Gp13yJeMTjigS9gW4yQQpQvZ9w2xmRn+9O T2i6KVCRHvvqsYY6l81/wgkfYyfAvazpHiy1y3ABQN4qEevxXwISbNENQFNSFdn8sIJX e9T2MupG43qoIWEaZJuIQuC4Hlpy2VxOS73dsKYR3tbUMbKMRHY1czMyEbdoRLe5Okt9 82rLK/yrcziBlF2jHT5NUdez8JOgiH5pR46+JrbiYnzzZaqcNykfRixpiHs+zOWEeKJd OoPE9ig+4WERdh26weBYjOqv4FxF7SZ78XfI6/iXmCinC7tQ2/mXwtsMUE9fI8FjA2Uh uhZQ== Original-Received: by 10.180.92.69 with SMTP id ck5mr12820746wib.14.1339321691201; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:48:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (i108036.upc-i.chello.nl. [62.195.108.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gc6sm15636790wib.0.2012.06.10.02.48.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:48:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8762bf1etu.fsf@zelenka.enovance.com> (Julien Danjou's message of "Tue, 29 May 2012 12:06:37 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.82.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150871 Archived-At: Hi Julien, Recent snapshots seem to solve my advice problem. But the problem still persists under another form: (Info-find-file "emacs") produces Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Info file emacs does not exist") signal(error ("Info file emacs does not exist")) error("Info file %s does not exist" "emacs") Also occasional errors during debugging pop-up when I try to jump to the source file of a core function. Vitalie. GNU Emacs 24.1.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2012-06-08 on lakoocha, modified by Debian >> Julien Danjou >> on Tue, 29 May 2012 12:06:37 +0200 wrote: > On Sat, May 26 2012, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> There are 2 bugs here: >> - a packaging bug: the file should not be missing. >> - a robustness bug: defadvice should fail gracefully in this case, since >> it does not really need to docstring to do its job. >> I think the first is on Ubuntu's side, but please file a proper bug >> report with M-x report-emacs-bug for the second. > Full disclosure: I'm trying to track this packaging bug down this is why > I asked that question. :)