unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: Barry OReilly <gundaetiapo@gmail.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: the state of the concurrency branch
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:16:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4biphpg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvfvryqwg8.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:13:56 -0400")

>>>>> "Stefan" == Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> It seems reasonable to me.  However I wonder whether timers ought to be
>> thread-locked the way that processes are.

Stefan> Ideally, neither should be thread-locked.  So I'd rather not lock
Stefan> it/them unless it's needed for backward compatibility.

I think the bad case is a situation where some code dynamically binds
some variable and then sleeps, knowing that the timer will fire and see
the binding.

If there are multiple threads, the sleep may switch threads and cause
the timer to run in a different dynamic environment.

Whether this warrants thread-locking, I couldn't say.
I don't know whether this sort of thing is common for timers.

Tom



  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-18 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-16 18:24 the state of the concurrency branch Barry OReilly
2013-10-16 20:25 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-18  1:41   ` Tom Tromey
2013-10-18  3:32   ` Tom Tromey
2013-10-18 18:13     ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-18 18:16       ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2013-10-19 18:41         ` Richard Stallman
2013-10-19 19:29         ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-19 21:42           ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-20  0:41             ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-21 15:08             ` Tom Tromey
2013-10-21 16:07               ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-21 18:17                 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-21 16:41               ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-19 20:21         ` Barry OReilly
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-08-25 19:26 Tom Tromey
2013-08-25 19:36 ` Paul Eggert
2013-08-25 19:43   ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-25 20:02     ` Paul Eggert
2013-08-26 14:55       ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-25 20:30     ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-26 16:48 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-26 17:04   ` Juanma Barranquero
2013-08-26 17:19     ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-26 18:51     ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-26 21:29       ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-27  2:30         ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-27 16:08           ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-27 18:05             ` Paul Eggert
2013-08-27 18:23               ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-27 18:39                 ` Paul Eggert
2013-08-27 18:46                   ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-27 18:52                     ` Paul Eggert
2013-08-27 19:08                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-27 19:12                         ` Paul Eggert
2013-08-27 18:26               ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-27 19:14             ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-27 19:24               ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-27 19:29                 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-28  0:50             ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-28  4:16               ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-28  4:31                 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-28  4:58                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-28 13:21                   ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-28 13:48                     ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-28 14:27                       ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-28 16:23             ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-29  3:54               ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-29 15:10                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-31  9:57                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-31 11:51                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-31 13:42                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-09-01 15:49                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-09-02 15:27                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-28  0:45           ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-28  2:34             ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-27 18:33         ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-28 15:58       ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r4biphpg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
    --to=tromey@redhat.com \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=gundaetiapo@gmail.com \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).