From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Annoying (frameset bug?): desktop-mode and maxmized frame Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:04:43 +0900 Message-ID: <87r4anil5g.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87ob5srgmz.fsf@gmail.com> <87zjpcpe9h.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwlcp33l.fsf@gmail.com> <87y54virdf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87vbzzczor.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384146303 13146 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2013 05:05:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 05:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Emacs developers To: Jambunathan K Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 11 06:05:07 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VfjgN-0006qr-Ov for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:05:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34676 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfjgN-0006nf-7h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:05:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46975) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfjgD-0006k1-VZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:05:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vfjg6-0003yh-Ly for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:04:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:50815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vfjg6-0003ya-BS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:04:46 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35009708DB; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:04:43 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E7E6911EEFA; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:04:43 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <87vbzzczor.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta34) "kale" 182d01410b8d XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165140 Archived-At: Jambunathan K writes: > When someone one KNOWS that I have CANCELLED my assignments on > paper There you go again. Get it through your head: nobody is going to bother about your politics in answering your technical posts. You're not that important to anybody except you (at least, I hope you're that important to yourself), so *you* should do that bothering about your assignments etc. Nor does cancelling your "future" assignments mean that you can't do assignments on a patch by patch basis. So if you're unwilling to hypothetically assign a hypothetical patch, you're pretty much going to have to say so with respect to each one. > > dealing with the foibles of X Window System window managers. > > Read my post again. I didn't thump my chest nor did I pound Juanma's. I don't have to; I remember what you wrote, and it was entirely self-centered and rude -- as is this most recent epistle of yours that I'm replying to. I repeat my recommendation to you, though: read three of another's posts before going off like that. I could very easily be writing to myself, as many here know. I know what I'm talking about; my advice is good.