From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:19:58 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87r3rdk1gx.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <54D80098.3020209@cs.ucla.edu> <54D85304.1030600@cs.ucla.edu> <54D9AC29.2020603@cs.ucla.edu> <54DA8539.1020905@cs.ucla.edu> <87zj8ktq8f.fsf@lifelogs.com> <54DD6413.1000403@cs.ucla.edu> <83wq3m436s.fsf@gnu.org> <834mqowbnh.fsf@gnu.org> <85egpsgf5z.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <85iof1anf8.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87lhhml72q.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429626355 15650 80.91.229.3 (21 Apr 2015 14:25:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:25:55 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 21 16:25:45 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YkZ7L-0005p8-1i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:25:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58798 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkZ7K-0003Kq-A9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:25:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33632) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkZ6x-0003Ho-3t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkZ6t-0001cp-52 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkZ6s-0001c8-Uw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:25:11 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YkZ6m-0005Tg-7L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:25:04 +0200 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:25:04 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:25:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LdvYEGa5nDYKtXUb+ZVUfNWmM+E= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185753 Archived-At: On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:06:35 -0400 Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Perhaps we should move on with "pure data" modules and implement "buffer >> interaction" modules later? SM> It's definitely not a requirement before it can be installed into SM> master. My criterion for installation into master is basically that the SM> probability we'll soon reimplement it differently is sufficiently low SM> (and for the code to be clean enough). Thanks. I'll concentrate on testing the simple "pure data" cases and see if a usable general data access model can emerge from that. If not, we'll figure out what works... Ted