From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:32:31 -0600 Message-ID: <87r3jnoxpc.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87vb98csu1.fsf@red-bean.com> <87twosp5ke.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fv0cm64g.fsf@gmx.us> <87si4bsktk.fsf@red-bean.com> <87wptnlbl6.fsf@gmx.us> <87pozfl2ut.fsf@gmx.us> <87d1vfl17p.fsf@gmx.us> <878u63p6sh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pozfchq6.fsf@red-bean.com> <87h9komkty.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ziydbgnd.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447878789 6819 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2015 20:33:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 20:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Kastrup , Pierpaolo Bernardi , emacs-devel To: Artur Malabarba Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 18 21:33:03 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9Pa-0004qQ-MU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:33:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38212 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9Pa-0006Yf-5H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34534) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9PI-0006VF-29 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:32:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9PD-00035U-3g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:32:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]:34609) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9PC-00035Q-Vz; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:32:39 -0500 Original-Received: by igvg19 with SMTP id g19so125961427igv.1; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:32:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=b2/tYZR9MR7RYlHNhYgyJCjYQPRON15H/dHNY3AsIYA=; b=Lobbojzdp/PKYHSPsh6CpzyiufhEiHVDmbaJmxC46JHY9oXoGqTipV0z4wr4fXt1Il 255GS8o2IFYK0/rS+2Jtl9s01e+KLl8G5OI/31jjbOvaTAwcIPpMm6QHA3RVjqj49KtJ AVAENsVY+fCpXGBYWbpG2cdtbzsM8Q/DBIkKg+CQX4dCDowVUvSdybEzVGIomPilMezH LcVZc4tsqlorj7lkLsdL0ERp926xHA5l43xTYpn78KUU9AZm6JMkeBUIVqp8dcVMb89z HL1M8lDHI8nfsO6bb0GC2OXm7gplGY8NMhRpSorXYBi9jH1e97RogenTOPVLy86cBIl3 SyvA== X-Received: by 10.50.20.100 with SMTP id m4mr9230416ige.33.1447878758458; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:32:38 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from floss (74-92-190-114-Illinois.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [74.92.190.114]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id qb2sm10673609igb.10.2015.11.18.12.32.37 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:32:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Artur Malabarba's message of "Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:20:47 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194752 Archived-At: Artur Malabarba writes: >2015-11-17 0:42 GMT+00:00 Karl Fogel : >> Artur, it sounds to me like there is not yet consensus on what C-o >> should do at column >0. There have been plausible arguments both >> ways. > >I just want to say I haven't forgotten about this thread. I'm 1 week >away from the most important day of the last 3 years for me, so I'm >going to be absent for 7 more days. After that, this thread is one of >the first things on my list. > >And don't worry about the timing of the release branch. I'm >considering this a bugfix, so I'll keep my change feature-freeze-safe >(there's a decent chance I'll just revert). Thanks for letting us know, Artur. If you're swamped, I'm happy to do the reversion (pretty easy for me, since I've been following the changes & the thread in detail), but I won't unless you say so. (Can only guess that "most important day" is Ph.D. defense? Break a leg!) Best regards, -Karl