From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: todo-mode doc bug Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:19:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87r3drv4yc.fsf@gmx.net> References: <20160326221513.15789.84807@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87d1qgu7az.fsf@gmx.net> <87inz6ui4g.fsf@gmx.net> <83r3du2eg2.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg9uuh3a.fsf@gmx.net> <83mvoi2diw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461745238 16827 80.91.229.3 (27 Apr 2016 08:20:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 08:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 27 10:20:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1avKho-0006Yi-Q0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:20:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41537 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avKho-0007Zu-8m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 04:20:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44036) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avKhZ-0007Xt-NE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 04:20:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avKhY-00089D-SH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 04:20:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:51185) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avKhT-00087w-2b; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 04:19:59 -0400 Original-Received: from rosalinde ([89.245.106.79]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LfC4q-1bSQSK1wr2-00omDS; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:19:56 +0200 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:rdcr5bDwF60qfB8zYDn7KuU/Nix5T/zmvfDN0RdTAmv+3qddwEA eSf3bbwyRd8Ha8CfnTeswQhX5Lv+DB/eZqidp7qDTQPx57UKB1aIAD6Kx4G2hvmkYlyfbi7 kZImy13ub5jU+rx8znz+IlHAuNhMxCMDc46gTI3CzcE312pnvTsgl+lzChrzeocRxlerZ7/ hS/GOkF1Ozmeqcln3j+Ug== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:FsMM3hwQ2fw=:j/aPgnn7oB9YRuk668dBcK iv4OSwGAAFYXodBoclxY3GcGz+7aUQAucRSkkBZudp1GIIFDo0hMfcbcCcPrMh2sUO3Ljng22 +TJDdWaAFhta2PY06zFTFlK9b1a577zATr1e4pA0uuLK8FLhXAqzKl5ZjgGwhpBhq4/QD9Rkn fe+F1VinI8Hou9Dns13RVeNjQb+F2/OF6ufSUb/Qo5woLBLzyB4ZXweTYs0NJxqHIS8uJXYMy BgeAvFEoYUm32ekPSMIfujsNncfkbvU1lYzP3TsChwK9EdrOblM7ohdhBQGyegxhX6hiO/QFO l1p8Qaa69oQnM+IheHoS24uUM3d4RrYAdigMg/jnQOboz7CzOPkgdbp2o8rns5SAyfoB9u0K1 k6BYRAoZSMBIvIt5hmVQr3rkBh6AcaYevzSeSIMrnAg5Lr6z/TeCRKx3bV2PS7ZsBut/xj1Zg emhLk4v/T2nMo/NuoHHyYpetldPOUSUc6qNbCFjBm6/dQM5kIvO3MdJub39g6xu47zkoyrwaU yJWxm05Rh7JjQMUGku1l2pB/p/Uh+9fgOJ50iTVnSdMVUyELhzLeB8H3UfEZgrQZNTlxcGuiw ochA02fAStHXToymMlsQUxTf77qn7o2qQgxM+JsII6NrJuRs/RKCdc/yJg7zla1wOvdTGlPRM +XiLB3PGUsKYBBEjTa6MjN8MASGW1d9/F4Lv/7BVooxtZqbnPJRA21IKuHlagcRhMxNyJZfSU GIO5qb9SB1hJ7q3i2wvUme6yRwgakLBC+/wiYCcmC8n4AwlDwODNP3rfkVjs+ce/fT/h2dtF X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203377 Archived-At: (Sorry for the lag in responding; I was detained by more pressing obligations.) On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:23:03 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Stephen Berman >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:18:33 +0200 >> >> > I have no opinion about closing the bug. >> >> There is no outstanding bug about this; my question was about whether it >> is necessary to file one for this doc string change > > No need. However, mentioning in the commit log the URL for the > discussion of the issue should be considered. This thread is the only discussion of this issue, so in the hope that you agree with me that it isn't relevant to the doc bug per se and hence wouldn't be appropriate to reference in the commit message, I've gone ahead and committed the fix without such a reference. Steve Berman