From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: el-search 1.0 (was: [Ann] elisp-refs, a semantic elisp search tool (GNU ELPA request)) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 07:28:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87r37i89km.fsf@web.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476509356 9943 195.159.176.226 (15 Oct 2016 05:29:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 05:29:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel To: Wilfred Hughes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 15 07:29:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bvHWm-0000HS-9C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 07:29:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50507 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvHWk-0003FA-L6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 01:28:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvHWe-0003Et-8f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 01:28:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvHWa-0000Cy-Uv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 01:28:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:57328) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvHWa-0000CM-Kq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 01:28:48 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.186.0.232]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lb1wz-1cf1Xh0LM1-00kigh; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 07:28:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Wilfred Hughes's message of "Fri, 14 Oct 2016 23:26:01 -0400") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:xfyVPgRgnqbpBWbmu6lecTeqN54jYutd6Ne8MKOChQi20FpNGb3 jdncCQzDmNOmx6zhwuLSpRU6dMKLyfFV/epL6XV9yI8z+KonYcU6bsA0HEmprx/emcSRhHP kTHNPAfxDUhgQxYfj/d2KNrX4gdKP08v+74bELYtunk1hdIsqm3TpBp9Fu0Xllou3M9LcCV B3Mo9nSPlT3+9iSCjlw9Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:pCb7/JNy0bE=:EBCKbBi83LtQWAnZwBzp6x DzFI7l17PymmcfykTIUxsiToejxfDydBHOaytdH4SvL1SFSGF1JheTSbH02VrknR7/3w0GMss tGAeMenIa3PRt9eC6oQxeTKrP2iZXCVkJACPCEgH/iEtOu23DDx07LAU4IIZctVRDn2kfH/ZZ 1NtuK93xfPWBARc28FJV3donxRibSAOlwxV3jIBpi2KXzzU7nIn3aVncLFApNLjumPgqJZzJ8 RJgV+c8QPhGzyjkaMWAZDBD6NbbQk5MunAgTUpNOHNl3KHbRibmCHtDG/fmXrpQaAO+gwril4 RRumSoES2CA/JTtDmaVk1Zuail4Rid0/4MHT5IqzhzNN+CIVq/SSbqXkWRuyM1eDeTCmmq9c7 o+JLta4JzAkkYc7VGZONKT+7MYIPfT0Y0g2WzsdljUGpo3rWzJJNOxdbgO1OdOnTw2MEh1Ac0 840kIwX3IOhiwzzWF9V4Zh03Bv1+qdN6Qvm7jWFZBdi4OPBTsMQNOJHcF6lMLXVpQOcgYPHUY oJ2GYYl7YqMDZgGGcSXRCGmcL2S+ZQ143lR7hK2LB4Azji4meka+CBcA3tFM/IdPfMMSWmYyJ tn047+ifwIFGmdkgenNufVyn7DPbf2/kZKuxjCVd8hiDnPBa5mWURP4knSI3HmTuB4DatJXWB aFk1zjmZ8/BWmLMPwIyt9FqNviHslzO4duiggUw+i7qSUAd9DhvNe8lQYhy1mj4SwQbTXqIej 12QEQIKOQdyHJBx8QEpbnZ1wzhZPI7xuFAg18nHkvh2gn8/JLcG94M/+RlfNCM/7dTgyA3Wc X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208273 Archived-At: Hi Wilfred, > I've written a package [elisp-refs] that does a semantic search of all > the elisp in the current Emacs instance. Cool, inspired by el-search...looks very nice. Will have a closer look. FWIW, I decided to publish el-search 1.0 on Elpa now, though I wanted to do so originally in a few days (hoping I left nothing half-baked), so that we see where both packages complement each other, or if we even should consider to merge them sometime later. I've implemented multi-searches now, but I don't have an occur like summary view, and it would probably be too slow for its approach anyway. Regards, Michael.