From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: debbugs-gnu-bugs doesn't honor debbugs-gnu-default-packages Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:11:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87r323d15j.fsf@detlef> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489263094 8674 195.159.176.226 (11 Mar 2017 20:11:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 20:11:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , Emacs developers To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 11 21:11:29 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmnMP-0001bf-3o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:11:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44591 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmnMV-00038n-0N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 15:11:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmnMO-00038h-Qh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 15:11:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmnMK-0005zV-RW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 15:11:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:49269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmnMK-0005yV-Hn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 15:11:24 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.50.95]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLvLE-1csH0X1o5c-007o0v; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:11:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Tino Calancha's message of "Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:46:09 +0900 (JST)") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:vbz154DNhMHR1xgmOOkPQ+hbl9usIKbw2mMZfpGR1ZLtWxltIEE OizjvxsllZeVTp3UQBEyV9KI7/GfOkPAhreX6QUBnsfaDwi089mFA1JcWX48tENHSJ0ONan jdyzu0LoYW2L4Wzmenck3mCZf9T1Xyiw+Ey8whiaM3Q6CfVTuZaeBrwEGQ0YqftEdN+p7aj JaiI4wu0SgVXRasF1XhTQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:tplLABBKMQc=:gtTO5W5/WGDDzwObztxEeG tyX85dQduvwTUTxKG24xI1bPrEHl8mUYrrLKYCkkZIQ2HTLeU3E80tCES8vDIO57mp5wgbzx/ 2pX+EliwqsE7bt3sZtMAnL8ozMlQp4pDeixTSzNYUVradCKEwoykADl8bLjoW/N56cTOeMI80 RTzVHjiS8uy4iOdGltkH1Nu4oF/BVsrW96COPyZmC4VJWGC7nh18SxojytzbBegC6fx9Jv0zu 3DpAW2OVpwWz6XWTiYCACAfJ6JMIREnyNycjAdk0hQYI0JELArjGPBpvZ3DwQInEShdEeA8CX UYwO2ujJwA198y1zDkHarScuJT+EDi1401GXzCJEgzqGsY4U4AJxNI0RyCL5eUllhFIzAS5/O kA6wULINnPZXW27x35iZ7sQPEipkYhSX98ra45njY68nMth+GX4wS6Svu7rYmYmpK8b79oaDv 4SgDla/8mHg5P6DPJnvXlEAwuUmoMY0Yo3GZdTcjHJfcOeFhYBo5zAvE+RqPYEm2L5lHzg/p6 3eqqOvDtwlPCrmvqeKrJU9TGRHQRp3usUSUDI3Vd+4erEU5shK4ITTrPMgerNb9nrZYbB2jWY 9UrskCEEXQN5y3nDe8m/zd7BY/ajd6FuJHfR4qcyo0YcDddD8BGb8MSdZDapasUKPL+MHkJxa tODYRd0GTeSCsHoaD/oCxMrZMnPy7Blq1hOceFMCbGczC7SWGYboLn8GRqleEUqCj8HKTV0UZ Nh6XekljJXcCkfXfLMZvtV4asBJ5amsY/R6hCC/Fna4sLYFscXRm15TwePXEv3uas47h4wwD X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212922 Archived-At: Tino Calancha writes: > [Forwarded because i used the wrong e-mail address included in > debbugs-gnu package. Maybe good occasion to update it :) ] Thanks for the hint; I've updated. > Hi Michael, Hi Tino, > Command `debbugs-gnu-bugs' doesn't honor `debbugs-gnu-default-packages'. > The addition of new packages in the bug tracker makes this command less > convenient. Sure, some people might want to see all bugs; but package > maintainers probably prefer that this command just list the newest bugs > against the package they are maintaining. This is a deficiency only if you apply it for a range of bugs, say "the last 10 bugs" or "all bugs between 23000 and 24000". Otherwise, it behaves as expected. `debbugs-gnu-bugs' is an Elisp function implementing the SOAP interface function newest_bugs, see . No other filters are applied. > If it's hard to make `debbugs-gnu-bugs' follow `debbugs-gnu-default-packages' > maybe we should add a new command to provide such functionality i.e., > to list the newest bugs filled against a package in > `debbugs-gnu-default-packages'. > > I don't know how to implement this. Any advice would be much > appreciated. We could extend `debbugs-gnu' for this. The back side is, that we could decide client side only. That means, we retrieve all bugs which match `debbugs-gnu-default-packages', but show then only the bugs "between 23000 and 24000". This is suboptimal in terms of performance. Let me think about. > Regards, > Tino