From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Gemini Lasswell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: list-threads Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 07:51:55 -0700 Message-ID: <87r2jgom7o.fsf@runbox.com> References: <87tvoiq208.fsf@runbox.com> <83pnz4py5t.fsf@gnu.org> <874lgeoz0h.fsf@runbox.com> <83o9emm4ab.fsf@gnu.org> <87wot9onul.fsf@runbox.com> <83o9ekvprk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533223633 27337 195.159.176.226 (2 Aug 2018 15:27:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 15:27:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 02 17:27:09 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1flFVI-0006vP-4S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 17:27:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46304 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flFXO-00043B-N3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 11:29:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37569) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flEyE-0005mi-El for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 10:52:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flEyB-0001xo-DD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 10:52:54 -0400 Original-Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:36062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flEyB-0001xA-0w; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 10:52:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=runbox.com; s=rbselector1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=IZ/4Qcx1McjNH4MwUSIhNAeOq2Ke+87yn1KuImSlSj4=; b=bX+UYNR6ErZ+DZ0QiNnT3WRI6v FiKZr6apzxs+wHBMsYr3A1snZ/ko8p8AtFPiny4+gpv2eJeAQ9br6EeGa/LxC9mJW0Fk69fKOi50h MwZzQRaN0bTFQiK1IgGthmJVBzRp8TCr+TTTTt1glEfNJESU5uRIt8Tz0v8SQIPzaze0y0m8jxSms bSoh+UClc2n+4CVouxVu9FRgNhWhayY4+LxeAISkMFD9ET/11EEdLxJPJyAMCqmskjsKNYm+bfu7d m6X9+mzlN4e/dm+oUyixFPiALmnsUpcYbjqDiEKCLHFT9YUdg4IzrCCKCEDFF2at9tv/XsMNBmw4Z B1GDNwOQ==; Original-Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1flEy9-0005CR-4u; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 16:52:49 +0200 Original-Received: by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:179284 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1flExK-0002ek-D5; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 16:51:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83o9ekvprk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 02 Aug 2018 16:53:19 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 91.220.196.211 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228110 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> If a thread is actively working the backtrace will just be a >> snapshot of where it was when you asked for the backtrace. > > I'm saying that this is impossible: any thread but the current one is > not "actively working". Yes. I used the wrong words there. Sorry for making it confusing.