From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: TEC Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "modern" colors Re: Changes for emacs 28 Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 01:26:47 +0800 Message-ID: <87r1r6j488.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20200909165723.kdnwicwvplmezusr@Ergus> <20200910102000.2t6tsju745xutg7u@Ergus> <20200910110832.ko66gqnqo4l664d6@Ergus> <20200911134225.zhnlq7cdhmu2iraj@Ergus> <20200911221435.go7b5kz2zcvxp2ft@Ergus> <20200912153723.ymnq3i5pugqf7lsy@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5187"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 Cc: ghe@sdf.org, Ergus , casouri@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 12 19:27:29 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kH9JB-0001FL-7w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 19:27:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48604 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kH9JA-0000wp-9r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 13:27:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43262) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kH9If-0000RR-C7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 13:26:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]:41827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kH9Ib-0007Gc-Kz; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 13:26:56 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id m15so2438824pls.8; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 10:26:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :date:mime-version; bh=9+XF9/yBBiepuetjsm9WWW8uoGRIIQp+eoduEFVLLMA=; b=Yq5r4VT+dIA3EV6duH+EosJ+4WpbV9UlhnjTLdcnQQ6ARk+J94AYmF1GQzV6f0f7xj I6phm6LvreGblwftJrSHGoLxD5p6wegz5IcHunzHh414tPLSvw9wGLIiYGd+x6+NcDpw iv9tKUBslrdi5v/Hisuof99HHwMZx1TRn3VOViVV/tf4WNu5D5lLjEozyw5VnyCwopot bR5BRRPSSg7siQd78JdYbNah2W5H0nsjjrJxVqWejmCcsTekxrzdNqyajcyeWTPEsOx0 rVA8NcNVg5/DGl/c85q4rrVlvqAM6LVyx/hhbYX45ouVdwblSkcyMsGOFSeS+gk6UVYD lL8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=9+XF9/yBBiepuetjsm9WWW8uoGRIIQp+eoduEFVLLMA=; b=fGBqNDbkhLt6z6ZUQswanxnCKZu16DdF3YWUGDRC6Z9EWrJhLPJihwFATfbbFr2L9E GZxOKll+rzPFV/tTLRB2yyT+4jCJkuDjkV64RBUWS31hMrpSntngLgJuaIXGO1WS9Bfh 5vYz55CDlP00TnHAJn3vL4K1gEJBuNqqZxTHjJdlqwqbygfqjgdfjvfEudedFX4C0D2j oqWQNljcYA4KpM50wWa5Q7+T6w1oRgCip6Q0dThtI6Xs2t63wSH43Hsc0SIEbbwzrQB7 orKKTJbxSVYxyppSSy9kfivmVQwejZVswK2asCvh3EtcZTyWa1uX1JCaXqGahou9Yd0x FbVw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533pI3n+Q2NMzfwj1VPITCpfKujrXchuD3H+1Olfm79ddLtyUQRy HdFEukNveYH1aeekevAbodKXbAGF3yNP6A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyttylWcfb8/lK20G4D7KkDUCVWMUDS9XXQ5wt36NvAqhKby55u4qSigKCjeEfM3pkFug1nSw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:56a:: with SMTP id 97mr7028759plf.130.1599931611550; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 10:26:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (180-150-91-8.b4965b.per.nbn.aussiebb.net. [180.150.91.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q5sm5814291pfn.172.2020.09.12.10.26.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 12 Sep 2020 10:26:51 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::632; envelope-from=tecosaur@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-x632.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255394 Archived-At: Alfred M. Szmidt writes: > You seem to have an experience with several other editors, which is > why I'm asking you specifically about the specific differences. I > cannot possibly go through all editors to figure which one you think > is modern in our view, and telling me to "just look around" without > even having the slightest clue where isn't very helpful. > > I'm simply trying to figure out what some of those subjective > differences are, but you're telling me to figure it out by myself. > Stefan too seemed interested in understanding what "modern" (be it in > your view, or otherwise) meant. > > Let me try to reiterate again, could you point out a handful of > differences in colors and/or fonts (to keep it simple) between Emacs > and some other editor (one is fine, several would be interesting too > but I understand that can be taxing) that you find more modern than in > Emacs? FWIW, prompted by this I'm working on this point ;) Timothy.