From: Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@russet.org.uk>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 21:49:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1magg4x.fsf@russet.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <831rec5apu.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 23 Jan 2021 10:17:01 +0200")
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> If the submodules cannot be worktrees, then I think we have to
>> abandon this approach.
>
> I'm not sure. There are alternatives to using worktrees, so the fact
> that some of us use worktrees in some workflows should not necessarily
> veto the submodule solution to integrating ELPA into Emacs, because
> this integration is more important than personal workflows.
>
> But maybe I misunderstand what you mean by "submodule cannot be
> worktrees", because AFAIU Phillip raised an issue that is a different
> one: whether submodules live well with different branches being
> checked out in different worktrees -- there's nothing there to suggest
> that submodules themselves should be worktrees.
Just so.
The version of git (2.25.1) on my laptop reports worktree and submodules
as being broken.
And the 2.30 also the same https://git-scm.com/docs/git-worktree
There are ways around all of this, of course, but this use of submodules
will break my workflow at least.
Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-24 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-21 1:41 policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball Stephen Leake
2021-01-21 14:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-22 10:56 ` [SPAM UNSURE] " Stephen Leake
2021-01-22 11:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-22 14:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-21 21:54 ` Phillip Lord
2021-01-23 2:50 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-23 8:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-24 16:26 ` [SPAM UNSURE] " Stephen Leake
2021-01-24 21:49 ` Phillip Lord [this message]
2021-01-25 19:38 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-25 19:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-25 20:39 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-26 1:04 ` Andy Moreton
2021-01-26 2:38 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-26 14:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-26 15:25 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-26 15:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-26 16:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-26 16:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-26 17:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-26 17:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-26 17:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-26 19:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-28 0:15 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-28 2:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-28 13:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-28 13:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-27 14:52 ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-01-27 14:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-26 18:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-26 18:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-27 14:21 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-27 14:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-27 14:48 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-27 14:42 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-27 16:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-23 9:27 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-23 9:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-24 2:28 ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-01-24 16:27 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-24 17:30 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-24 18:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-24 20:10 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-24 20:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-24 20:42 ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-01-25 22:00 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-26 1:57 ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-01-26 14:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-26 15:24 ` Andreas Schwab
2021-01-27 14:37 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-27 16:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-28 0:10 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-28 13:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-25 19:30 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-25 19:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-27 14:31 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-27 14:44 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-28 3:34 ` Andy Moreton
2021-01-27 16:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-29 17:47 ` Phillip Lord
2021-02-01 8:45 ` Robert Pluim
2021-02-01 15:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-24 22:09 ` Phillip Lord
2021-01-25 19:14 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-27 11:10 ` Phillip Lord
2021-01-27 14:31 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-28 0:05 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-24 20:19 ` Stephen Leake
2021-01-24 2:59 ` Dmitry Gutov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r1magg4x.fsf@russet.org.uk \
--to=phillip.lord@russet.org.uk \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).