From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Consistent face for keys in *Help* and `substitute-command-keys' Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:19:56 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87r1kgu5m3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <83zgzjhvdn.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6rhxwah.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmlxspt.fsf@gnu.org> <834khpxr0s.fsf@gnu.org> <8335x8ybw9.fsf@gnu.org> <87czwageno.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878s6xwngp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <874khjq6p8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875z1ylrdw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38998"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 15 10:50:21 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lLjrg-0009zT-8E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:50:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42072 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLjrd-0005mP-Ek for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 05:50:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLjqr-0004y7-8r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 05:49:29 -0400 Original-Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:34871) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLjqp-0002wH-80; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 05:49:28 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 91.129.108.46 Original-Received: from mail.gandi.net (m91-129-108-46.cust.tele2.ee [91.129.108.46]) (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D23D01C0007; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 09:49:19 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Wed, 10 Mar 2021 18:45:50 -0600") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.197; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay5-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266477 Archived-At: >> I suppose DarkBlue is intended to make it look more like a link when >> help-link-key-to-documentation is non-nil? > > Something like that, yes. > > Mostly I just wanted to make it brighter without making it more grey, > i.e. "highlight" it more. Blue seemed a non-opinionated choice, as we > already have some blue in the help buffer, and yes it also makes sense > due to the planned linking. Now that we have a clearly visible border, it's possible to use the background that you proposed earlier - grey95 that looks nicer when there is already heavy highlighting with a border and blue foreground. BTW, after the recent change of adding a border to widget-field, its border is indistinguishable from the background color. It would help to make the border color slightly darker, e.g. gray70.