From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [GNU ELPA] New package proposal: aggressive-completion.el Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 21:30:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1jrw4f6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o8evok58.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuonw68c.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11116"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.5.11; emacs 28.0.50 Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 03 21:32:55 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lSm0t-0002nU-Oy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 21:32:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47196 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSm0s-000508-O6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 15:32:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSlzx-0004aA-En for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 15:31:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSlzu-0004hk-JM; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 15:31:57 -0400 Original-Received: from auth1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.227]:34979) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lSlzj-0007Q0-3G; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 15:31:50 -0400 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D518127C0054; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 15:31:42 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 03 Apr 2021 15:31:42 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeikedgudeggecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enmhhishhsihhnghcuvffquchfihgvlhguucdlfedtmdenucfjughrpehffgfhufffjgfk gggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefvrghsshhilhhoucfjohhrnhcuoehtshguhh esghhnuhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephffghedtveeiteegkedvkeetjeej uefhffetleekgfekvefggeejgfeltdejgfdvnecukfhppeekjedrudeifedrfedurdduhe egnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhrnhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidqkeeijeefkeejkeegqd eifeehvdelkedqthhsughhpeepghhnuhdrohhrghesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: from thinkpad-t440p (p57a31f9a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.163.31.154]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 346C21080057; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 15:31:42 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <87tuonw68c.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267362 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn writes: > BTW, the top-level README isn't up-to-date, right? It still talks > about the master branch which is now main. I'll fix that later. Done. > And I've missed some instructions for the simple case where I add a > package that lives and only lives in elpa.git. I ended up with > > git checkout --orphan externals/aggressive-completion > git rm -rf . > rm -rf admin/ packages/ .pkg-descs.mk GNUMakefile > cp ~/aggressive-completion.el . > git add aggressive-completion.el > git commit & push > > Especially the third step is bad because it nukes the admin worktree > and the worktrees in packages/. Well, I could have skipped that step > and just be careful not to stage and commit anything of those... > > Is there no git command to just create an empty orphan branch and not > switch to it so that one can immediately create a worktree with it > without nuking the ones one already has? Ah, I simply should have "git init"-ed a one-off repo with aggressive-completion.el and followed the documented recipe. That was too obvious for me. :-) Bye, Tassilo